Saturday, September 22, 2018

Using a tool versus using a tool effectively; online teaching for dummies*

*This blog post has no endorsement from the publishers of the very popular "..for dummies" series of books.  I just liked the sentiment.

Part I: Effective Tool Use

In a past life I used to teach students in a construction apprenticeship program. One of the first lessons students were taught in that program was how to use a hammer. It seems like an intuitive tool right - hold handle, use metal head to pound nail. However, there is some real physics to be explored if you want the hammer to do the work, not your forearm.

In my present iteration of “Amanda the Professional”, I help teachers and students use online tools to enhance their teaching/learning. Same concept as my previous job, I spend time helping others use tools effectively.

In a prescribed literary review examining the value on online learning, I wasn’t surprised to see the same theme I encounter everyday - tools aren’t effective if you don’t know how to use them.

Part II: Marketing Schemes
“Touted for its cost effectiveness and convenience, online learning provides opportunities for more learners to continue their education in various settings (Oliver, 1999).”
“Technology now enables schools to offer online programs with better student and instructor collaboration, flexible (asynchronous) learning, problem specific feedback, automated interactive lessons or presentations, and simulations of almost anything conceivable (Byrd, 2012).”
Written a decade apart, these two papers reviewing online learning tout the value of e-learning in terms of features, not effectiveness.  There is nothing wrong with buying a product for its features.  As an ed tech professional, I would just like to encourage others to then pursue how to use such products to improve their efficacy.
Maxpixel Under CC0 Public Domain

So, buckle in. I’d like to offer you a short lesson on how to make online learning effective; because I think by now, we all get that educational technology tools can be fun and flashy and offer flexibility to our instructional practices - but if we take a moment to learn how to make these tools effective everyone wins.

Part III: A Short Ride to Success
Have faith, this will be a short ride as there are only two major themes for effective online learning:
  • Student engagement
  • Teacher involvement
Let’s start with student engagement. Research shows that students who feel engaged with their coursework perform better(Koc, 2017), enjoy the class more(Burke, 2017), and are more likely to stick with their education(Shea 2006). Specifically, students who are given responsibility for their learning feel more engaged. One way to increase responsibility is to require students to reflect on what they have learned(Angiello, 2010). Competency-based education practices that help students identify learning targets and then empower them to seek information and experience to prove mastery of learning also favorably ramp up student engagement(Mayeshiba, 2010).

Now, if the key to effective online learning is student responsibility and engagement, then you may be asking - “what then, is the role of the teacher”. Abundant amounts of research show that an instructor in an online class brings the most value through creating an online community where learners can feel safe exploring thoughts, asking questions, and seeking feedback(Majeski, 2017). “...a strong and active presence on the part of the instructor—one in which she or he actively guides the discourse—is related both to students sense of connectedness and learning(Shea, 2006).

Part IV: The Final Destination
Casey, A.(2014). End of the Road
Licensed Under CC-BySA 2.0

I mentioned that this was to be a short ride, right? This is the end of the line. Teachers seeking to create EFFECTIVE online learning environments should work toward identifying ways to promote student responsibility for learning so as to free him/herself to be responsible for the development and maintenance of a safe and active online learning community.

To slaughter a perfectly good movie line:

If you build it (the community), they will learn.


References:
  1. Angiello, R. (2010). Study Looks at Online Learning vs. Traditional Instruction. Education Digest76(2), 56–69.
  2. Burke, A., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education18(1), 11–24.
  3. Byrd, R. (2010). Using Appropriate E-learning Systems to Optimize Teaching and Learning. GSTF Journal on Computing2(3), 47–52.
  4. Koc, M. (2017). Learning Analytics of Student Participation and Achievement in Online Distance Education: A Structural Equation Modeling. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice17(6), 1893–1910.
  5. Majeski, R., Stover, M., Valais, T., & Ronch, J. (2017). Fostering Emotional Intelligence in Online Higher Education Education Courses. Adult Learning28(4), 135–143.
  6. Mayeshiba, M., Jansen, K., & Mihlbauer, L. (2018). An Evaluation of Critical Thinking in Competency Based and Traditional Online Learning Environments. Online Learning22(2), 77–89.
  7. Oliver, R. (1999). Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education, 20(2), 240–254. doi:10.1080/0158791990200205

6 comments:

  1. Hi!

    I love this post! I wanted to point out that my first blog post was very similar in that I address the need for student engagement and the need for faculty experience with technology. I feel that so many of us (including myself) are sometimes afraid to use the tech or integrate new ideas from fear of failure that really boils down to not knowing how to use the tool effectively. It is important that we embrace these new ideas and strategies in order to create the student engagement we desire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment Rhonda. It would be a refreshing change to teacher PD days to allow teachers to play with technology to find what works for them. Just like early elementary has found success in turning math into games to make learning playful, teachers deserve the same opportunity!

      Delete
  2. Great article and solid point. When tech tools started popping up all over, the craze was sharing tech tools at every faculty meeting. I remember wondering to myself why I needed to know 5 different tools that essentially did the same thing. I could not find meaningful use for the first one, much less the next four. We have moved on and I am glad we no longer find an awesome tool and then fit it in a lesson. This past year I provided PD to our teachers on teaching the content using the appropriate digital tool (along with revisiting SAMR and TPACK ) for effective learning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alicia, I am so glad that you are teaching SAMR and TPACK. I think it is so important that pedagogy is revisited any time technology is introduced.

      Delete
  3. You make some very good points. Like many, I love to play with new electronic toys. I am often tempted to try and bring them all into my classes. This is not the best approach educationally. In fact, the University of Central Florida is having an issues related to this exact issue. As the article notes, the business school decided to mandate all their courses be taught in a hybrid (though they are, in fact, almost fully online) (Lieberman, 2018). These changes did not seem to involve teaching the instructors how to use online technology for the best educational outcomes. This has resulted in an uprising among the students who feel that the program is a waste of time and that they are basically having to learn everything on their own. The instructors have not attempted to create a beneficial learning community and therefore no learning community exists. The self-motivated students are likely doing fine in the program, but most students enjoy/need the social learning aspect of education in order to achieve the best possible outcomes. Time and again, articles have shown the large benefits of having learning communities in online education (Cherney, Fetherston, & Johnsen, 2018; Lohr & Haley, 2018; Reese, 2015). Great post!

    References:

    Cherney, M. R., Fetherston, M., & Johnsen, L. J. (2018). Online Course Student Collaboration Literature: A Review and Critique. Small Group Research, 49(1), 98-128.

    Lieberman, M. (2018, September 21). Furor Over Blended and Active Learning. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com.

    Lohr, K. D., & Haley, K. J. (2018). Using Biographical Prompts to Build Community in an Online Graduate Course: An Adult Learning Perspective. Adult Learning, 29(1), 11-19.

    Reese, S. A. (2015). Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociation. Education and information technologies, 20(3), 579-588.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Shaun, thanks for the feedback.
    I think the biggest takeaway lesson from my graduate certificate in OTID is the importance of a well-trained and engaged instructor.
    In the article I cited from Mustafa Koc, the students felt the most engaged in the flipped classes. No reason for this perception was sought by the researchers, but I have to imagine it is because there is comfort in knowing someone will be there to guide you if you get lost. Now, we just have to get schools using e-learning on board with the value of securing e-teaching skills in their staff.
    - Amanda

    ReplyDelete