 |
| "Nerd Crossing" by jparise is licensed by CC BY-SA 2.0 |
I work in an education environment where hands-on, relevant activity is highly prized. Our instructors, who challenge students with project-based learning and inquiry-based learning, are considered forward thinking and innovators. When I was tasked by administration with adding blended learning into the mix, I was shunned by the teachers. "Our students are hands-on learners, " one teacher scoffed. "I don't want to be a study-hall teacher," yet another announced at the mention of blended curriculum becoming a mandated practice.
This paradox of pedagogy forced me into my own experience of inquiry-based learning.
 |
| "Inquiry" by NY is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 |
"How does one use online learning successfully with hands-on learners?"
"Can online learning be used effectively in an educational setting where relationships have long been the key to student success?"What was easy to uncover, in research and case studies, was the importance of asynchronous discussions in developing higher levels of learning/critical thinking.
Olesova, Slavin, and Lim (2016) concluded that students assigned the role of summarizing the discourse in asynchronous discussions demonstrated the most evidence of higher-order thinking. The case study actually evaluated the level of critical thinking achieved with a variety of assigned roles - a student who would initiate the discussion, a student would act as devil's advocate, and as a control, students without an assigned role. The only role that showed correlation with higher order thinking was the "summarizer".
This theme of using asynchronous discussions to elevate student learning and critical thinking also shows up in the work of Yang (2007) who demonstrated that an "inspired instructor and some energetic teaching assistants who use Socratic dialogues during small-group online discussions can successfully develop students’ (critical thinking skills)..." My forward-thinking peers understand the value of assessing knowledge, application, and behavior. They would certainly see value in generating opportunity for higher-order thinking; however, they may still argue that a face-to-face class discussion could bring equitable results.
 |
| "New Blooms Pyramid" by edtechworkshop licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 |
I pushed on in my research and was rewarded with the find of "Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning" Northey, Bucic, Chylinski and Govind (2015). This work examines the use of Facebook to increase engagement in college level classes. The asynchronous discussions were a supplement to a bricks-and-mortar course. This is where the parallels between the study and my work first intersect. If you remember, I was on a mission to turn a project-based classroom into a blended classroom.
Northey et al. (2015) uncovered a significant difference in both the perceived and actual participation of students who were required to engage in a asynchronous discussions through Facebook as compared to students in the control groups whose classes did not include asynchronous discussions. In fact, and this is the part that I am most excited to share with my colleagues, the study identified a correlation between engagement in the Facebook discussion and the class participation of students. What amazing educator doesn't want more student engagement? My skeptical colleagues would even be pleased to know that the study showed that Facebook, as a familiar tool to most, had no technology learning curve to inhibit use!
 |
| "iPhone Retina Display" by Paul Hudson is licensed by CC BY 3.0 |
Now, to balance my enthusiasm, Costley (2016) used evidence from the observation of more than 200 students over three college semesters to conclude that teacher presence, more than social presence increased cognitive presence. In fact, Costly (2016) found that social presence and teacher presence were inversely related. So, I worry some that high school students will not have the executive function necessary to focus on learning in a Facebook group. I am, however, hopeful that the emergent student leadership among college students in Northey et al. (2015) could be fostered in high school students.
While my tactile colleagues will not be in the audience reading further for the annotated bibliography, they are all professionals in search of providing the optimum learning environment for their students. I have faith that the research I have compiled will make a compelling argument for adding asynchronous discussions to their blended learning, project-based teacher tool kits.
References:
Costley, J(January 2016). The Effects of Instructor Control on Critical Thinking and Social Presence: Variations Withing Three Online Asynchronous Learning Environments. The Journal of Educators Online, Volume 13 (Number 1), 109-171
Northey; Bucic, Chylinski, Govind, R. (2015). Increasing Student Learning Using Asynchronous Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, Volume 37 (Number 3), 171-180
Olesova, L, Slavin, M., and Lim, J (December 2016). Exploring the Effect of Scripted Roles on Cognitive Presence in Asynchronous Online Discussions. OLC Online Learning Journal Volume 20 (Issue 4)
Yang, Ya-Ting C., (June 2018). Educational Technology Research & Development, (Volume 56). 241-264
